The Challenge of the Arid West
Donald Worster, University of Kansas
©National Humanities Center
|
|
(part 4 of 4)
SCHOLARS DEBATE
|
|
 |
Kansas (?), n.d.
| Wichita State University |
|
 |
Dust storm over Phoenix after a 153-day drought, 1972
| National Archives |
"What is the role of nature in social evolution?"
|
|
|
The first historian to address the challenge of aridity was Walter Prescott Webb in his book The Great
Plains (1931), which argued that the natural environment created "an institutional fault-line" across the
nation. Laws and technologies developed in humid America could not get over that line, forcing people
to make such innovations as barbed wire (to substitute for wooden fences) and windmills (to pump
underground water). Webb saw a nation divided by nature and unequal in development. Moreover, he
raised a broader question that previous historians had ignored: what is the role of nature in social
evolution? That question took on new significance in the Dust Bowl years. Wind erosion and forced
migration caused many to question whether westerners themselves had understood their environmental
challenges sufficiently and had learned to adapt to drought cycles and aridity. Where Webb had seen a
distinctly new region emerging, others saw a failed civilization that had been foretold by Powell.
 |
 |
Palm Springs California, 1988
| Paul Starrs
|
"a 'garden of the world' where deserts had
ruled"
|
|
|
 |
In the early postwar period, Powell's star continued to ascend until he became a shining hero to many
scholars and conservationists. They were less interested in the role of nature in history and more in the
cultural blinders that Americans wore when they moved west. Two classic works that followed Powell
in criticizing maladaptive attitudes were Henry Nash Smith's Virgin Land (1950) and Wallace Stegner's
biography of Powell, Beyond the Hundredth Meridian (1954). Both of them found the nation and the
region alike to be unrealistic in expectations. Smith showed how an "agrarian myth," joined with
imperial ambitions, convinced people that they could create a "garden of the world" where deserts had
ruled. Stegner, one of the most influential western voices in the twentieth century, described a battle
between, on the one hand, Powell the scientist and, on the other hand, regional political and economic
leaders who pursued extravagant dreams of growth.
|
|
 |
Jawbone Siphon, part of Los Angeles aqueduct system, 1988
| G. Donald Bain |
"most historians have become more critical of how water has been managed in the West"
|
|
|
Following the rise of the environmental movement and the new field of environmental history, scholars
have focused more and more on western water politics. Although some still celebrate achievements of
the Bureau of Reclamation and other dam-building agencies, most historians have become more critical
of how water has been managed in the West. Norris Hundley, author of three books on the
subjectThe Great Thirst (1992), Water and the West (1975), and Dividing the Waters (1966)has
argued that the government overestimated the amount of water available for use, particularly in the
Colorado River, creating serious legal conflicts among the states and between the United States and
Mexico. He sees a history of chaos and disorder in water planninginefficiency, waste, and
strifeinstead of coordinated development or cooperative spirit.
That view has been echoed in the writings of Robert Kelley in Battling the Inland Sea (1989) and
Donald Pisani in, among others, Water, Land, and Law in the West (1996) who, like Hundley, have
emphasized California. In their opinion, the federal government has not done nearly enough to govern
water; it has built massive dams and other infrastructure but has not used its power to settle questions
of distribution, leaving them instead to a cacophony of local interests.
To a point they are right; Washington has seemed reluctant to confront the self-seeking demands of land
and water entrepreneurs who would impose their values on nature
and society in the West. But, as I
have argued in a number of works, the federal government has more often shared rather than opposed
those values. Working together rather than in opposition, capital and bureaucracy have drastically
reordered the arid region. They have shared a common logic, a broad plan of conquest, in the name of
economic growth. They have achieved, as intended, an "empire" that today boasts forty million irrigated
acres and sprawling metropolises. They have accumulated power as well, just as Powell feared they
would. The most intriguing question for this historian is how long they will be able to hold on to that
power or maintain their imposed order over a desert that can never really be conquered or evaded.
Whether culture or nature, society or aridity, proves dominant in the long term is an issue that can only
be settled by scholars in the future. Most likely, neither force will win out absolutely and civilization will
continue to face the challenge of how to live successfully in this difficult land.
Donald Worster is the Hall Distinguished Professor of History at the University of Kansas. He earned a
Ph.D. from Yale University in 1971 and has held fellowships from the National Endowment for the
Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Guggenheim Foundation. He is past
president of the American Society for Environmental History. His books include Nature's Economy: A
History of Ecological Ideas (1977/1994), Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s (1979), Rivers
of Empire: Water, Aridity, and the Growth of the American West (1985), Under Western Skies: Nature
and History in the American West (1992), The Wealth of Nature: Environmental History and the
Ecological Imagination (1993), and A River Running West: The Life of John Wesley Powell (2000).
Address comments or questions to Professor Worster through TeacherServe "Comments and Questions."
TeacherServe Home Page
National Humanities Center
7 Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12256
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Phone: (919) 549-0661 Fax: (919) 990-8535
Revised: July 2001
nationalhumanitiescenter.org |