ethics – On the Human

The Health Impact Fund: a better way to reward new medicines

Jason King — Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:28:39 +0000

Thomas Pogge, Leitner Professor of Philosophy and International Affairs chair, Yale University

With some of the goods and services we consume, supplying the first unit costs vastly more than the rest. Building a subway line costs billions. The additional cost of making it carry more passengers is minuscule by comparison: pennies per ride for

Continue reading The Health Impact Fund: a better way to reward new medicines

The Sacred and the Humane

Jason King — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:00:43 +0000

Human Rights are all the rage. They have become, currently, a very popular arena for both political activism and rampant discourse. Human rights, as we all know, are the rights humans are due simply by virtue of being human. But there is nothing simple here, since both “human” and “rights” are concepts in need of investigation. One deep philosophical issue that invigorates debates in human rights is the question of their foundation and justification, the question “where do human rights come from, and what grounds them?” There are two essentially different approaches to answering that question — the religious way and the secular, or philosophical, way.

Continue reading The Sacred and the Humane

The Ethics of Captivity

Jason King — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:22:50 +0000

Though conditions of captivity vary considerably for humans and for other animals, two of the central philosophical issues that emerge in discussions of human imprisonment prove instructive in thinking through the ethical issues raised by captivity for non-humans — autonomy and dignity. When captives have their physical and immediate psychological needs met and are free from suffering, so they are not being harmed in those ways, we can we still ask if there something wrong with holding them captive.

Continue reading The Ethics of Captivity

The Case for Animal Rights

Jason King — Thu, 12 May 2011 15:36:55 +0000

Some nonhuman animals resemble normal humans in morally relevant ways. In particular, they bring the mystery of a unified psychological presence to the world. Like us, they possess a variety of sensory, cognitive, conative, and volitional capacities. They see and hear, believe and desire, remember and anticipate, plan and intend. Moreover, what happens to them matters to them. Physical pleasure and pain—these they share with us. But also fear and contentment, anger and loneliness, frustration and satisfaction, cunning and imprudence.

Continue reading The Case for Animal Rights

Are Women Human?

Jason King — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:26:44 +0000

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a document that could provide specifically for the formation of trade unions and "periodic holiday with pay", might have mustered the specificity to mention women sometime, other than through "motherhood," which is more bowed to than provided for. If women were human in this document, would domestic violence, sexual violation from birth to death, including in prostitution and pornography, and systematic sexual objectification and denigration of women and girls simply be left out of the explicit language?

Continue reading Are Women Human?

Taking Life: Animals

Jason King — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:48:49 +0000

Is meat eating justified by the fact that millions of animals would never exist should no one care to eat them?

In Social Rights and Duties, a collection of essays and lectures published in

Continue reading Taking Life: Animals

Humans, Disabilities, and the Humanities?

Jason King — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:46:22 +0000

Bioethics is much too important to be left to bioethicists.

At the outset of his 2006 book, Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design, Jonathan Glover asks:

Progress in genetics and in reproductive technologies gives us growing power to reduce the incidence of disabilities and disorders. Should we welcome this power, or should we fear its

Continue reading Humans, Disabilities, and the Humanities?

A Trans-Species Perspective on Nature

Jason King — Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:47:24 +0000

A trans-species perspective is an all-encompassing stance towards nature that embraces the continuity and comparability of all species’ lives. It shapes the way we view ourselves in relation to other animals and involves changing our current model of those relationships from one of separation and condescension to one of communalism and respect. Given the mass extinctions, global destruction of habitat, environmental degradation, and continued mass exploitation of other animals, nothing short of a shift in human psychological perspective is needed to turn things around.

Continue reading A Trans-Species Perspective on Nature

Moral Camouflage or Moral Monkeys?

Jason King — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:17 +0000

In “The Metaphysician’s Nightmare”, Bertrand Russell described a Hell in which there is a special torment for practitioners of each branch of scholarly inquiry. In the place in Hell reserved for statisticians, for example, a pack of monkeys walk aimlessly and endlessly on typewriters, each time creating a perfect rendition of a Shakespearean sonnet. Our

Continue reading Moral Camouflage or Moral Monkeys?

Common Ancestry and Natural Selection in Darwin’s Origin

Jason King — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:13:24 +0000

This is a précis of an argument that I developed in an article called “Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards?” The article was published in 2009 and may be found on my web set at http://philosophy.wisc.edu/sober/recent.html. An expanded version of the argument is the first chapter of a book that I’m publishing at the end

Continue reading Common Ancestry and Natural Selection in Darwin’s Origin